This Advent, we encourage you to support worthy causes that bring hope and healing to those in need by giving to organizations that we as a firm and as individuals support, such as Mercy Ships, Gifts to Children of Ukraine, and initiatives led by Nicholas Kristof. We wish you a blessed holiday season!
Welcome to this week’s edition of Geopolitics & the Day After. Each week, we curate and synthesize key developments from global politics, economics, and financial markets, drawing from a wide range of trusted sources. Our goal is to provide you with a clear, concise, and insightful overview of the forces transforming the world today and shaping tomorrow. Below is an overview of what we cover this week:
Geopolitical Concerns examines Trump’s new National Security Strategy, which centers on transactional diplomacy, prioritizing coercive engagement in the Western Hemisphere while weakening alliances and institutional norms, creating unpredictable U.S. commitments and openings for rival powers like Russia and China.
Geoeconomics takes a look at how the Fed’s divided rate cut underscores mounting tensions between inflation risks, political pressure, and fiscal constraints, as Treasury debt surges past $30 trillion and market distortions—from bond buybacks to extreme gold-oil ratios—signal deep structural imbalances.
Global Junctions explores how China’s power-driven AI strategy—anchored by massive energy capacity and diversified industrial bets—contrasts with the U.S.’s high-risk, AI-centric approach, as both nations face challenges in autonomy, infrastructure, and strategic prioritization.
Global Trajectories dives into the idea that global tensions now stem more from internal fractures within cultural and political blocs than civilizational clashes, as China pursues influence across strategic domains while worldwide protests and governance crises reshape state priorities.
Geopolitical Concerns
Trump’s Power Paradox: What Kind of World Order Does His National Security Strategy Seek?
Michael Kimmage, Foreign Affairs
Venezuela between US Military Threat and Regime Survival
Jesus Antonio Renzullo Narvaez, GiGA
Europe’s center is barely holding — and Trump plans to blow it apart
Tim Ross, Politico
Russia is not as resilient as it wants you to think
Economist
Trump’s new National Security Strategy reframes U.S. foreign policy around personality-driven power, transactional diplomacy, and a revived sphere-of-influence logic that deprioritizes alliances and institutional norms. The document places the Western Hemisphere at the center of U.S. strategic attention, signaling a shift toward coercive engagement and selective retrenchment despite global challenges in Europe and the Indo-Pacific. This personalization of foreign policy provides openings for leaders like Putin and Xi while leaving U.S. commitments unpredictable and heavily dependent on presidential discretion. The strategy is already visible in Washington’s approach to Venezuela, where policy has oscillated between dealmaking and confrontation as competing factions within the administration push for hardline pressure or transactional engagement. The current military buildup in the Caribbean indicates a turn toward coercion, weakening diplomatic channels, and raising the possibility of an intra-elite transition in Caracas rather than a full democratic shift.
European political stability is also entering a more volatile phase, just as Washington signals active support for nationalist forces. Populist parties are gaining momentum across the U.K., France, Germany, and the Netherlands, while Trump’s strategy explicitly aims to cultivate “resistance” to centrist governments, particularly on migration. Against this backdrop, Russia’s apparent resilience masks vulnerabilities as military advances remain costly and limited, economic pressures are deepening, and public sentiment is drifting away from support for the war. Although Putin continues to project strength, declining living standards, internal fatigue, and the growing social acceptability of anti-war attitudes reflect a widening gap between propaganda and reality.
Geoeconomics
Fed’s Fractured Vote Signals Trouble Ahead for Future Rate Cuts
Nick Timiraos, The Wall Street Journal
US Treasury Market Tops $30 Trillion, Doubling Since 2018
Elizabeth Stanton, Bloomberg
America’s bond market is quiet—almost too quiet
Economist
Gold Just Proved Oil Should Be $200
Giacomo Prandelli, The Merchant’s News
The Federal Reserve’s latest rate cut exposed a rare degree of internal division, with nearly one-third of policymakers signaling they would not have supported the move. The split shows the challenge facing both Jerome Powell and his successor as they balance softening labor-market signals against persistent inflation risks amid political pressure for deeper cuts. The institutional design of the FOMC appears increasingly strained as the Trump administration questions the legitimacy of certain Fed officials and tests avenues to reshape the committee. Meanwhile, U.S. fiscal dynamics are amplifying the macroeconomic constraints. Treasury debt has surpassed $30 trillion, propelled by years of structural deficits and pandemic-era borrowing that now carry far higher servicing costs. Even elevated tariff revenues fall short of covering interest expenses, leaving the government with limited room to maneuver while contemplating future increases in longer-term issuance.
At the same time, the U.S. bond market is displaying an unusual calm. Despite short-term funding pressures and ongoing Fed policy shifts, volatility in long-duration yields has fallen to levels not seen since 2021. This outcome is attributed to the Treasury’s expanded buyback program by many analysts, which has made it one of the largest purchasers of long-dated government bonds. While the initiative aims to improve liquidity, its scale may be suppressing market signals more broadly. Meanwhile, commodity markets are flashing a starkly different message: gold has surged past $4,200 an ounce while oil remains near the low $60s, driving the gold-to-oil ratio to historic extremes. Analysts arguing for mean reversion see this divergence as evidence of a deep mispricing in energy markets, emphasizing structural underinvestment, fragile supply buffers, and rising geopolitical risks. If the ratio returns even halfway to long-term norms, current pricing implies a materially higher clearing level for oil, showing how monetary shifts and physical constraints are interacting to reshape global asset valuation.
Global Junctions
China’s AI Power Play: Cheap Electricity From World’s Biggest Grid
Raffaele Huang and Brian Spegele, Wall Street Journal
Could America win the AI race but lose the war?
Tim Wu, Financial Times
Chasing True AI Autonomy: From Legacy Mindsets to Battlefield Dominance
Vitaliy Goncharuk, War on the Rocks
Southeast Asia’s EV acceleration and Japan’s data center bottlenecks
Kenji Kawase, Asia Nikkei
China’s massive expansion of power-generation capacity has become a defining advantage in the global AI competition, enabling data centers to operate at costs far below those in the U.S. and helping Chinese firms compensate for shortcomings in advanced chip manufacturing. The “East Data, West Computing” plan seeks to build a national computing infrastructure that could underpin China’s broader technological ambitions. Yet this electricity-driven strategy carries risks, including rising debt for state utilities and concerns about overcapacity. By contrast, the United States has concentrated far more heavily on AI itself, with private-sector spending exceeding $350 billion and a national narrative shaped by the pursuit of AGI and “singularity” expectations. China’s more diversified approach of prioritizing EVs, batteries, solar, and broader industrial capacity suggests it is hedging against uncertainty in AI’s long-term payoff, while U.S. strategy increasingly resembles a high-stakes, single-track bet that could leave other strategic sectors underfunded.
As both powers grapple with energy, infrastructure, and strategic prioritization, defense planners are wrestling with another technological crossroads: the need for true AI autonomy in contested battlespaces. The U.S. is urged to shift from remotely piloted systems toward platforms that can perceive, decide, and act independently in GPS-denied and electronic-warfare-heavy environments, capabilities Russia and China are already fielding. However, data scarcity, limited testing infrastructure, regulatory barriers, and slow procurement processes continue to impede progress. At the same time, broader trends across Asia highlight how technology, geopolitics, and industrial constraints intersect. Southeast Asia’s rapid EV adoption, Chinese firms training AI models in offshore data centers, and Japan’s construction bottlenecks in building new facilities illustrate how regional demand for compute power is reshaping investment patterns. Meanwhile, China’s push to strengthen strategic industries shows how its long-term planning spans far beyond AI alone.
Global Trajectories
The clash within civilisations
Janan Ganesh, Financial times
Elizabeth Economy, Foreign Affairs
Corruption, Overreach, and Hardship: The Global Drivers of Protests in 2025
Judy Lee and Thomas Carothes, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
China chases economic rally with giant Hainan free trade port
Wataru Suzuki, Nikkei Asia
Contemporary global tensions increasingly reflect internal fractures within cultural and political blocs rather than Huntington-style clashes between civilisations. Conflicts in Ukraine, Sudan, Yemen, and the Taiwan Strait show how disputes often emerge among actors with shared historical or cultural identities, driven less by civilisational boundaries than by divergent political trajectories or challenges to established orders. These patterns extend to Western societies themselves, where debates over identity and governance generate sharper hostility toward internal dissenters than toward external adversaries. These dynamics coincide with China’s expansive pursuit of influence across new strategic frontiers. Beijing is methodically building capabilities and institutional leverage in domains such as the deep seabed, the Arctic, space, cyberspace, and global finance. Although its efforts face resistance, China is positioning itself to shape emerging rule sets and technological ecosystems, presenting a comprehensive strategy that contrasts with a more fragmented U.S. approach.
Widespread protests across 2025 illustrate how corruption, democratic backsliding, and economic hardship are reshaping political expectations worldwide. Demonstrations triggered by scandals, institutional overreach, and increasing living costs have erupted across diverse political systems, with youth activism prominent but not unprecedented. These domestic pressures form part of a wider re-evaluation of governance models and state capacity. China, navigating its own economic headwinds, is experimenting with a different trajectory through the launch of the Hainan free trade port. Intended as a showcase for liberalization amid tariff-driven turbulence, Hainan aims to attract investment through zero-tariff imports, preferential tax regimes, and large-scale regulatory reforms. Yet structural constraints, from talent shortages to weak local fundamentals and uneven consumer demand, pose challenges to delivering the transformative growth Beijing envisions.
